Picture Freedom has the support of the American Society of News Editors, the Journalism Education Association, the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies at Middle ...

HATTIESBURG, Miss. — A Mississippi resident properly pleaded his First Amendment violation claims against three Laurel City council representatives who interrupted his speech during a public meeting ...

July 29 (Reuters) - You’ve got to be 16 to drive, 17 to enlist in the military, 18 to vote. Is there also a minimum age for First Amendment protection? After a 7-year-old girl was punished for ...

The Supreme Court categorically rejected the argument that the mere regulation of an algorithm raises First Amendment ...

THE FIRST AMENDMENT is having a moment. It earned a C+ on a recent report card from the Newseum Institute. It’s the beating heart behind The Post, about the publication of the Pentagon Papers. And ...

On the books in 31 states, the laws are designed to deter baseless litigation that attempts to intimidate or silence people exercising their First Amendment rights.

The First Amendment can’t waver because some people think a particular form of speech is offensive or graphic. There simply is no neutral, unbiased way to decide. So we have to allow for it all.

Is distributing intimate photos of current or previous sexual partners without their consent protected by the First Amendment? A state appeals court says yes. Now it will be up to the state ...

Pay heed, all who interfere with Tim Tai’s newsgathering: He will photo-splain the First Amendment to you. Tai is the student journalist seen in the viral video trying to take pictures of the ...

It was October 2001, not exactly the heyday of publisher Larry Flynt’s many controversies, and professor Robert Richards couldn’t understand what the fuss was about.

The First Amendment’s bar against criminalizing protected speech demands nothing less.” Correction, Aug. 8: We originally referred to FIRE as the Foundation for Individual Rights and Education.

As a defense, Fox and others invoke the First Amendment and Sullivan, arguing that their reporting on the 2020 election and its aftermath is legally indistinguishable from the kind of basic, just ...