If you've been hoping for clarity from the US Copyright Office on AI training -- whether AI companies can use copyrighted materials under fair use or creators can claim infringement -- prepare to be disappointed.

Shira Perlmutter ousted after U.S. Copyright Office warns AI firms can’t freely use online content. Trump sides with tech interests.

UK creatives demand more copyright transparency from AI companies.

AI art may be everywhere, but the legality of AI image generators trained on non-licensed data, and of the images generated by them, is still in doubt. Now, in what sounds like a win for artists, a US Copyright Office report has concluded that the fair use defence does not apply to commercial AI training.

On the same day that the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) officially released part three of its study into the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on copyright law, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) announced its own 436-page report on AI and copyright.

amicable resolution of this conflict through licensing. Of course, how a firm can meaningfully compensate all copyright holders in their training data may not be economically possible.” Despite these challenges, there is widespread support for AI ...

In a significant move to address the tension between copyright and generative artificial intelligence (AI), the UK’s Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA), Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS),