The efficacy and safety of early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for the treatment of infants with very low birt ...

There remains uncertainty concerning the safety and efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with those of conventional ventilation for the respiratory support of very preterm ...

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was equivalent in efficacy to conventional ventilation in preterm infants but did not appear more beneficial for any particular subset in this population ...

Conventional treatment is by intermittent positive-pressure ventilation where oxygen-enriched air is blown into the lungs at high pressure.

According to results published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, conventional ventilation and laminar airflow were effective for keeping methylmethacrylate fumes below harmful levels ...

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation seems as effective as conventional ventilation in preterm infants; study findings do not support selecting this method based on gestational age or other factors.

Conventional ventilation mimics spontaneous respiration with repeated inflation-deflation of the lungs at a physiological rate of 30 to 60 breaths per minute.

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient–ventilator interaction in a pediatric population during NAVA as compared with conventional ventilation.

Aug. 29, 2002 — High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) for premature infants should be reserved to a few select centers, while the others should continue conventional low tidal volume ...

NASA's cheap, simple ventilator just got emergency approval from the FDA. It could prevent shortages in a 2nd wave of COVID-19 cases.

A study of ventilation strategies in high-income countries has shown that high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for preterm babies gives outcomes that are no better or worse than conventional ...