Over the past several months The Scientist has provided a forum for a debate purportedly on the compatibility of science and religion, although in fact the discussion has been limited to the dualistic ...

Help students understand that science and religion are two different ways of knowing the world. They are not necessarily in conflict; they are two perspectives, two different lenses. Science ...

Consider the differences ... But religion doesn't need medicine to validate itself. It doesn't require scientific empiricism because it is based on faith. And when you mix faith with science ...

In my mind, this is the protection mechanism that science has built into it so that it does not intrude into faith-based belief systems. In religion there's a different protection mechanism.

Krauss is known for his opposition to the idea of “non-overlapping magisteria” — that is to say, the idea that science and religion are simply about two different things, and that therefore ...

Scholar explains what the LDS Church's latest essay on science and religion says about where the faith stands now on ...

The “Great Commoner,” William Jennings Bryan, an outspoken proponent of the historic Christian faith, and the “Great Agnostic,” Clarence Darrow, a critic of Bryan and the faith he espoused ...