The results from a small, phase 2, proof-of-concept, randomized trial comparing simple with radical hysterectomy among 40 patients with lesions measuring no more than 2 cm were recently reported ...

For more than 2,600 patients, 7-year survival rates were 93.9% with simple hysterectomy versus 94.2% with modified radical hysterectomy and 95.4% with radical hysterectomy (P=0.15), reported ...

Simple hysterectomy is not inferior to radical hysterectomy in terms of 3-year incidence of pelvic disease recurrence among women with low-risk cervical cancer, according to study data published ...

Researchers analyzed long-term survival of women diagnosed with low-risk cervical cancer, from 2010 through 2017, who received simple, radical, or modified radical hysterectomy.

A late-stage trial of low-risk women with cervical cancer found that having a simple hysterectomy instead of a radical hysterectomy resulted in similar outcomes in terms of keeping the patients ...

Now the newly-published SHAPE trial finds the cancer recurrence rates after three years in both the simple and radical hysterectomy patients were very similar: less than 3% in both groups.

For people with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer, a simple hysterectomy removing the uterus and cervix has similar cancer outcomes to a more invasive radical hysterectomy – all while providing ...

READ MORE: Simple Hysterectomy May Be Effective in Low-Risk Cervical Cancer. Of note, sexual pain was significantly higher in patients from the radical hysterectomy group versus those in the simple ...

Simple hysterectomy led to better sexual health outcomes compared with radical hysterectomy in patients with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer, according to updated findings from the phase III ...

For more than 2,600 patients, 7-year survival rates were 93.9% with simple hysterectomy versus 94.2% with modified radical hysterectomy and 95.4% with radical hysterectomy (P=0.15), reported ...