SlashGear got behind the 2025 Audi RS Q8 Performance and for what you get, it's a bargain. Here's everything you need to know ...

Audi has a new high performance trim for its RS Q8 SUV, offering a whopping 40 additional horsepower over the outgoing model.

2025 Audi RS Q8 Performance Super SUV First Drive: Because You Can, Even If You Don’t Need To . Very few people need an SUV capable of lapping the Nürburgring in 7:37.

Given the RS Q8's new name and all these enhancements, you'd think its primary focus would be track performance. But it's not—the way Audi's engineers think of it, most RS Q8s will never see red ...

The RS Q8 is already a handsome car, so for the 2025 model year facelift, Audi hasn't messed with success. For $7,100 you can now spec a package that, in addition to those 23s in matte black, adds ...

While the RS Q8 performance may be the fastest production SUV at the Nurburgring, it fails to secure a quarter-mile win ...

The RS Q8 performance SUV returns to the U.S. for the 2025 model year for $137,495; The twin-turbocharged 4.0-liter V-8 returns as well, tuned to 591 hp or 630 hp in the RS Q8 Performance; ...

The Audi RS Q8, updated with a mid-cycle refresh for 2025, doesn't quite achieve those lofty heights, but with 631 hp from its 4.0-liter V8 it has 40 hp more than its predecessor.

The RS Q8 Performance relies on a familiar twin-turbo V8 engine, but it makes the most power yet. 631 horsepower and 627 pound-feet of torque power all four wheels via Quattro all-wheel drive and ...

If you want Audi’s new 2025 RS Q8 Performance — featuring what Audi claims is its most powerful production combustion engine to date — you’ll have to pay nearly twice the price of a ...

These enhancements position the RS Q8 performance as a high-performing SUV that balances power, luxury, and practicality. Detailed Specs. Price. $136,200. Engine. 4.0-liter turbo 8-cylinder.

The RS Q8 Performance is claimed to accelerate from zero to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds; the last RS Q8 we tested did the deed in 3.2 ticks, so we wouldn't be surprised to see a sub-3.0-second run ...