A lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission alleges that food and beverage maker PepsiCo engaged in illegal price discrimination by giving unfair price advantages to one big-box retailer.
The commission alleges that the retailer, whose name was redacted in the statement from commissioners, received “unfair pricing advantages” that were not made available to others.
The drink, featuring a “burst of sweet cherry” and “creamy vanilla” flavors, will be available in both original and sugar-free varieties, according to the release. It’s set to replace Pepsi Mango, which was introduced in March 2021, Nexstar reported.
Pepsi is planning to debut a brand-new flavor this month, marking its first “permanent” addition to the brand’s beverage portfolio in four years.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is suing PepsiCo based on the soda company offering preferential pricing to a large retailer. Can you guess which one?
The Federal Trade Commission is suing Pepsi, alleging it has rigged competition by offering unfair pricing deals to a big retailer at the expense of smaller rivals, resulting in higher costs for shoppers.
A modern-day renaissance man, jazz trumpeter and opera composer Terence Blanchard is an 8-time Grammy Award-winner whose film scores have earned him two Oscar nominations. “I’m
Pepsi has pretty big news for people who love the soda (Coke fans, feel free to disregard this article). The brand will very soon be releasing a new — and permanent — flavor.
Calling all Pepsi lovers, it’s time to raise a toast to 2025! The cola giant has just announced its newest creation: Pepsi Wild Cherry & Cream. Launching nationwide this January, Pepsi Wild Cherry & Cream combines the bold citrus flavor of Pepsi with indulgent cherry and creamy vanilla for a nostalgic twist.
Pepsi is hosting a contest to crown the greatest seafood boil restaurant in The Big Easy for The Big Game. The competition is heating up like a spicy crawfish boil for Pepsi’s “Super Bowl Boil Showdown.
The Federal Trade Commission sued PepsiCo on Friday, alleging that it has engaged in illegal price discrimination by giving unfair price advantages to one large retailer at the expense of other