On June 13, 1966, in Miranda v.Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that, in order for confessions and other information obtained while a suspect is in custody to be admissible in court, police had to ...

The Miranda warning comes from one of the biggest legal cases of the 1960s--and thanks to countless arrest scenes in TV and movies, it's one of the best-known applications of the Fifth Amendment.

The "Miranda warning" requires that a person being interrogated is told of the right against self-incrimination, the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning, ...

Here’s what a “digital Miranda warning” might look like Smartphone owners need to know if—and when—they need to reveal their passcodes.

Taking up one of the most famous and harshly assailed decisions in American law, the Supreme Court forcefully reaffirmed Monday that the Constitution requires police officers to give suspects ...

The Miranda warning used in parts of Florida told suspects: "You have the right to talk to a lawyer before answering any of our questions. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, ...

Warning to respect Miranda. By SETH ROSENFELD, OF THE EXAMINER STAFF Aug 27, 2000. In a dramatic about-face, police across the state are being warned to obey the U.S. Supreme Court's famous ...

The Miranda warning tells citizens their constitutional protections, and Guam’s Law Week activities highlight the important role of Miranda rights and the justice system in society.

Why Miranda Warnings Are Not Always Read During Arrest. Contrary to what TV might show, police don’t always have to read you your Miranda rights the moment they slap on the cuffs.

WASHINGTON — If there is one constitutional protection known to anyone with a television set, it is the familiar warning required by the Supreme Court’s 1966 decision in Miranda v.Arizona.