Roughly half of the California National Guard troops placed under federal control and sent to Los Angeles are going home ...

California’s court fight to reign in the president's use of troops in Los Angeles now hangs on a 19th century law with grim ...

The military's active-duty end strength would grow by about 26,000 troops next year under plans being considered in the House ...

A rising wave of racist violence in the South prompted President Ulysses S. Grant to legal and military action against the Ku ...

The Trump administration sent the soldiers back to state command, allowing them to return to firefighting work. Thousands ...

ANALYSIS: A federal appeals court may have sided with the White House for now, but historical comparisons to using National Guard troops during the civil rights movement are dangerously misleading ...

The 2,000 troops will join about 2,100 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines who are already deployed in L.A. Latest U.S.

A federal judge asked if the Trump administration's military deployment in Los Angeles violates a law that prohibits troops from conducting civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil.

California's fight to rein in President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles hinges on a 19th century law ... But by the time Congress sent federal troops to begin Reconstruction in ...

The image depicted is from 1960, the last time a president called in federal troops over a state’s objections to enforce the law. It was just three years after President Dwight D. Eisenhower had ...

California's fight to rein in President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles hinges on a 19th century law with a a blood-soaked origin and a name that seems pulled from a Spaghetti Western.

In the case of Ruby Bridges, President Eisenhower sent in federal troops to escort her to desegregate her school in 1960, because angry mobs had gathered outside to block the 6-year-old.