For more than 2,600 patients, 7-year survival rates were 93.9% with simple hysterectomy versus 94.2% with modified radical hysterectomy and 95.4% with radical hysterectomy (P=0.15), reported ...

Simple hysterectomy is not inferior to radical hysterectomy in terms of 3-year incidence of pelvic disease recurrence among women with low-risk cervical cancer, according to study data published ...

Researchers analyzed long-term survival of women diagnosed with low-risk cervical cancer, from 2010 through 2017, who received simple, radical, or modified radical hysterectomy.

A late-stage trial of low-risk women with cervical cancer found that having a simple hysterectomy instead of a radical hysterectomy resulted in similar outcomes in terms of keeping the patients ...

Now the newly-published SHAPE trial finds the cancer recurrence rates after three years in both the simple and radical hysterectomy patients were very similar: less than 3% in both groups.

Simple hysterectomy can now be considered “the new standard of care” for patients with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer, according to the lead author of a new study that found simple hysterectomy ...

READ MORE: Simple Hysterectomy May Be Effective in Low-Risk Cervical Cancer. Of note, sexual pain was significantly higher in patients from the radical hysterectomy group versus those in the simple ...

For people with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer, a simple hysterectomy removing the uterus and cervix has similar cancer outcomes to a more invasive radical hysterectomy – all while providing ...

Simple hysterectomy led to better sexual health outcomes compared with radical hysterectomy in patients with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer, according to updated findings from the phase III ...

For more than 2,600 patients, 7-year survival rates were 93.9% with simple hysterectomy versus 94.2% with modified radical hysterectomy and 95.4% with radical hysterectomy (P=0.15), reported ...