My argument runs like this. I'll construe "science" as the set of tools we use to find truth about the universe, ... The "war" between science and religion, then, ...

Several opinion pieces over the past year or so have recommended improving communication between scientists and the public through clarifying the fundamental difference between science and society ...

The “war” between science and religion, then, is a conflict about whether you have good reasons for believing what you do: ... The most common accommodationist argument is Stephen Jay Gould’s thesis ...

There is a new war between science and religion, rising from the ashes of the old one, which ended with the defeat of the anti-evolution forces in the 2005 “intelligent design” trial.

Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne will be holding a series of lectures on "The Search for Truth in Science and Theology" starting with a two-hour lecture this Sunday at 2:30 p.m. at the Crill Performance ...

Coyne dismisses this as a tu quoque dodge, a way of saying that “science is just as bad as religion,” which is in fact no argument in favor of the latter. Defenders of faith also cite the good ...

In my opinion, there is no conflict between science and religion. They deal with two different spheres of understanding. Science deals with man’s effort to understand how the world operates ...

Consider the teapot-tempest over religion and science that has mysteriously broken out in 2014, ... no one on any side of the argument understands its philosophical and theological history, ...

Leon R. Kass, M.D. Let me first restate the gist of my long, complicated, and yet very incomplete argument concerning the state of the age-old tension between modern science and biblical religion ...

An evolutionary biologist makes the case that there’s no reconciling science and religion. In the search for truth, one tests hypotheses while the other relies on faith.