Over the last several months, a deep sense of unease has settled over laboratories across the United States. Researchers at ...

The demise of federal subsidies for renewable energy and electric vehicles (EVs) is a mistake, but far from fatal. It’s a ...

A new study challenges stereotypes by showing vegetarians score higher on values like power, achievement, and stimulation ...

A new study reveals the ‘welfare versus work paradox’: when wages sink close to subsistence, welfare can be the rational ...

The work has informed national dietary guidelines; led to therapies for breast cancer prevention and treatment; and ...

Children of less-educated mothers saw a large cognitive gain from basic schooling compared to peers with more-educated ...

Experts have long pointed to inflammation as a natural part of getting older. But a new paper suggests it might be more a ...

A blood test for insulin resistance (a hallmark of diabetes) may offer clues about the speed of memory loss for people with ...

Twenty-four top research universities warned that the Trump administration's move to cut off federal funding at Harvard could cripple the scientific infrastructure behind U.S. medical innovation.

Basic, curiosity-driven research made up about 40 per cent of studies, much done in universities. It makes sense.

The study used data from 815,273 participants from 76 countries and found that global refractive correction (eREC) is currently at 65.8%, just six percentage points higher than in 2010.