So my understanding is EC2 provides a complete virtual machine and we can use it to install anything. Be it huge physical files or deploying your .Net/PHP code. But EC2 is ver costly as …

Jan 15, 2022 · S3 will, however, support up to 5 TB of data in a single object and users can store as many objects as they like. EBS volumes are limited to 1 TB and can be attached to only a …

Jan 25, 2017 · S3 is highly scalable: It can handle massive volumes of requests. If you served content from Amazon EC2, you'd have to scale-out to meet requests; S3 has in-built security …

Jan 26, 2015 · More reliable: Amazon S3 is a regional-based service replicated across multiple Availability Zones, as opposed to a web server that might be a single point of failure; Cheaper: …

Dec 4, 2011 · The S3 storage costs are no where near as high as the hourly costs of running an EC2 instance. You'll be left with storage and bandwidth costs alone using S3+CloudFront. …

May 28, 2023 · These are the locations where requests are sent, such as requests to launch an Amazon EC2 instance or to upload data to an Amazon S3 bucket. If you have resources in a …

Jan 16, 2015 · Amazon CloudFront sits "in front" of your application on Amazon EC2 and/or your content in Amazon S3. It caches content in 50+ locations when people access your …

Nov 25, 2021 · If you haven't developed a backend for your site then go for s3, and if you developed a custom backend (using Django, express, etc) then go for Ec2. S3 is just a storage …

Aug 7, 2016 · EBS will always be more faster if you compare EBS vs S3 for data transfer, as EBS is directly attached to the EC2 instance. But again the storage limitation comes in picture for …

Apr 11, 2015 · S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Unlike EBS or EFS, S3 is not limited to EC2. Files stored within an S3 bucket can be accessed …